MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rayleigh scattering formalism for the tune-out wavelength: Application to the 2 <sup>3</sup> S state of helium

2020· article· en· W3034547796 on OpenAlexaff
G. W. F. Drake, Jacob Manalo, B. M. Henson, K. G. H. Baldwin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRayleigh scatteringWavelengthPolarizabilityScatteringHeliumAtomic physicsPhysicsFormalism (music)Stark effectLaserOpticsQuantum mechanicsSpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synopsis The tune-out wavelength for an atom interacting with an incident laser beam is reformulated as a zero in the Rayleigh scattering cross section instead of the dynamic polarizability (or AC Stark shift). The two pictures are equivalent in lowest order, but not when higher-order retardation effects are taken into account. Detailed high-precision calculations in Hylleraas coordinates will be presented for the tune-out wavelength of helium at 413 nm near the 2 3 S – 3 3 P optical transition, including D-wave retardation corrections, and compared with recent high-precision measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207