De la transidentité du patient au vacillement identitaire du clinicien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteur de cet article se propose de déplacer le curseur habituellement mis sur la conflictualité des patient/e/s vers la subjectivité du/de la clinicien/ne. Il interroge ainsi son identité de psychothérapeute orienté par la métapsychologie et ses défis contre-transférentiels dans le cadre de son travail en institution avec des adultes transgenres. En narrant les vicissitudes de la psychothérapie psychanalytique de David, patient composite pensé à partir des cures de plusieurs sujets aux identifications de genre atypiques, il esquisse les divers moyens de métaréflexion clinique qu’il a envisagés afin d’ajuster sa position, systématiquement compromise par les problématiques identitaires du patient, ainsi que par ses propres préjugés et réactions inconscientes. Il décrit en outre comment le contexte contemporain des transidentités marqué par l’activisme et la rectitude politique est susceptible d’entraver la vocation analytique consubstantielle à l’exploration de l’inconscient par définition a-normatif et politiquement incorrect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".