MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034701458 · doi:10.7759/cureus.8544

Nephroureterectomy of Right-to-Left Crossed Fused Renal Ectopia with Urothelial Carcinoma

2020· article· en· W3034701458 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Hearn, Rebecca Power, Landan MacDonald, Paul Johnston, Michael Organ

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUrothelial carcinomaCuffUrologyRenal carcinomaCarcinomaBlood lossSurgeryRadiologyBladder cancerPathologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urothelial carcinoma in a crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) is an exceedingly rare clinical finding. We describe the surgical management used to treat upper tract urothelial carcinoma in a 64-year-old man with a right-to-left CFRE. Nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision was the treatment of choice. The fused kidney was carefully dissected until an area of demarcation emerged between the vasculature supplying the left and right moieties. Pressure was applied to the isthmus separating the two moieties, and a sharp incision was made to release the left moiety. The operation was completed with limited blood loss. Pathology revealed a high-grade T3 papillary urothelial carcinoma with negative margins. To our knowledge, the case is the first to report urothelial carcinoma in a right-to-left CFRE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207