Thermo-Exergetic Assessment of the Steam Boilers Used in a Cuban Thermoelectric Facility
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, was made a thermo-exergy evaluation of four steam boilers that are used in the thermoelectric power plant belong to a Cuban productive company, which, have not been sufficiently studied from the energy point of view. The methodology for the estimation of the thermal and exergy efficiency values of these facilities is established and systematized in an algorithm. For this purpose, in this paper the GOST method is used in the assess evaluation of the steam boilers (direct and indirect method). The final results show a high correspondence between the gross thermal efficiency values obtained by the direct and indirect methods, their difference does not exceed 2.7% in the 87.5% of each variant calculated and the average value was 1.89%. The use of the thermal energy and the exergy in the boilers compute values near of 90.14 and 46.42% respectively. The application of proposal procedure shows a favorable behavior of the facilities object of study in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it