PLVER: Joint Stable Allocation and Content Replication for Edge-assisted Live Video Delivery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The live streaming services have gained extreme popularity in recent years. Due to the spiky traffic patterns of live videos, utilizing the distributed edge servers to improve viewers' quality of experience (QoE) has become a common practice nowadays. Nevertheless, current client-driven content caching mechanism does not support caching beforehand from the cloud to the edge, resulting in considerable cache missing in live video delivery. State-of-the-art research generally sacrifices the liveness of delivered videos in order to deal with the above problem. In this paper, by jointly considering the features of live videos and edge servers, we propose PLVER, a proactive live video push scheme to resolve the cache miss problem in live video delivery. Specifically, PLVER first conducts a one-tomultiple stable allocation between edge clusters and user groups, to balance the load of live traffic over the edge servers. Then it adopts proactive video replication algorithms to speed up the video replication among the edge servers. We conduct extensive trace-driven evaluations, covering 0.3 million Twitch viewers and more than 300 Twitch channels. The results demonstrate that with PLVER, edge servers can carry 28% and 82% more traffic than the auction-based replication method and the caching on requested time method, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".