MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034752634 · doi:10.1063/5.0008889

Flow field reconstruction and prediction of the supersonic cascade channel based on a symmetry neural network under complex and variable conditions

2020· article· en· W3034752634 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP Advances · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsCascadeExtrapolationArtificial neural networkComputer scienceAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)Supersonic speedFlow (mathematics)Convolution (computer science)Test setArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeometryMechanicsMathematical analysisPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A data-driven model containing a symmetrical deep neural network is proposed to reconstruct the flow field structure in a cascade channel by measuring discrete pressure values on the wall of the supersonic cascade channel. The model designed is to demonstrate that the deep neural network can realize the reconstruction and prediction of the flow field structure in the supersonic cascade channel under complicated and changing working conditions. The dataset used for model training is derived from numerical simulation of the supersonic cascade channel. The symmetrical model includes a transposed convolution part and a conventional convolution part, which, respectively, implement up-sampling of the pressure data and further extraction of features. The generalization ability and scalability of the model are analyzed from the contour plots of the pressure and density gradient. In order to verify the ability of the model to reconstruct unknown operating conditions, the organizational form of the training set and testing set has been specially designed to achieve the ability of interpolating outwards. In the testing set, the symmetrical model has a certain ability to realize extrapolation and prediction, and the flow field structure can be accurately reconstructed by using the discrete pressure values on the wall surface of the cascade channel. Moreover, to accurately evaluate the regression model proposed by this study, the correlation analysis was also applied in this study. The results show that the worst linear correlation coefficient is 0.9848 in the testing set, indicating that the model has satisfactory ability to reconstruct and predict the flow field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it