Flow field reconstruction and prediction of the supersonic cascade channel based on a symmetry neural network under complex and variable conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A data-driven model containing a symmetrical deep neural network is proposed to reconstruct the flow field structure in a cascade channel by measuring discrete pressure values on the wall of the supersonic cascade channel. The model designed is to demonstrate that the deep neural network can realize the reconstruction and prediction of the flow field structure in the supersonic cascade channel under complicated and changing working conditions. The dataset used for model training is derived from numerical simulation of the supersonic cascade channel. The symmetrical model includes a transposed convolution part and a conventional convolution part, which, respectively, implement up-sampling of the pressure data and further extraction of features. The generalization ability and scalability of the model are analyzed from the contour plots of the pressure and density gradient. In order to verify the ability of the model to reconstruct unknown operating conditions, the organizational form of the training set and testing set has been specially designed to achieve the ability of interpolating outwards. In the testing set, the symmetrical model has a certain ability to realize extrapolation and prediction, and the flow field structure can be accurately reconstructed by using the discrete pressure values on the wall surface of the cascade channel. Moreover, to accurately evaluate the regression model proposed by this study, the correlation analysis was also applied in this study. The results show that the worst linear correlation coefficient is 0.9848 in the testing set, indicating that the model has satisfactory ability to reconstruct and predict the flow field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".