MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034757494 · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.006

Prioritising Urological Surgery in the COVID-19 Era: A Global Reflection on Guidelines

2020· article· en· W3034757494 on OpenAlexaff
Stavros Gravas, Georges Fournier, Mototsugu Oya, Duncan J. Summerton, Roberto Mario Scarpa, Piotr Chłosta, Ioannis Gkialas, Liping Xie, Nur Rasyid, Damien Bolton, Reynaldo Gómez, Laurence Klotz, Sanjay Kulkarni, Simon Tanguay, Jean de la Rosette

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Urology Focus · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Family medicineMEDLINEDiseasePathologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.118
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.198
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1180.198
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.015
Scholarly communication0.0160.017
Open science0.0080.019
Research integrity0.0320.052
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.293
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Urology FocusSame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207