MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034783706 · doi:10.46692/9781529206913.007

The Politics and Ethics of Fieldwork in Post-conflict Environments: The Dilemmas of a Vocational Approach

2020· other· en· W3034783706 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationPoliticsSociologyEnvironmental ethicsPolitical sciencePedagogyLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 16 June 2014, Alexander Sodiqov was arrested by the security services while conducting fieldwork in Khorog, Tajikistan. He was interviewing an opposition leader who had been involved in a protest movement at the time he was arrested. Alex was subsequently charged with espionage offences and detained in a high security prison by the State Committee on National Security (SCNS) of the Republic of Tajikistan, a country which has seen intermittent political violence since the formal end of its civil war in 1997. At the time he was a PhD student at the University of Toronto and working with us on an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) project based at the University of Exeter studying conflict management in Central Asia. Having been charged under article 305 of the criminal code, he faced the likely prospect of a prison sentence of up to 20 years on his conviction. A global campaign was launched and, on 23 July, Alex was freed on bail but remained under investigation. On 10 September, he was allowed to leave the country and arrived back in Canada, where he still resides. While Alex was freed, the investigation was not formally discontinued; the repercussions of the case for his family and friends have continued and the chilling effect on academic research in particular and civil society in Tajikistan in general are still apparent. The case proved to be a turning point in the relationship between local academic community and authorities. It was consistent with increasing authoritarianism in Tajikistan, which was apparent long before 2014, and from which, as Alex's case proved, academics are not insulated. However, after 2014 this repression apparently assumed a more organized and structural character. The international controversy and wider criticism caused by Alex's arrest appeared to change the state's attitude and policy towards the Tajik academic sector. As a result, the authorities have introduced a set of new restrictions on academic activities and structures in Tajikistan. For instance, field trips and research on the ground (such as opinion polls, interviews), have become the subject of severe control and excessive scrutiny. The government has considerably tightened and lengthened the process of approval and agreeing on conducting academic research. The investigation continued for several years— and may still be officially open. Alex was never formally acquitted and the security agency never admitted the illegality of his detention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207