MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034873336 · doi:10.4000/books.pub.14148

Le roman d’imagination scientifique dans ses rapports au roman d’aventures littéraire de l’entre-deux-guerres

2018· book-chapter· fr· W3034873336 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Kawczak

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses Universitaires de Bordeaux eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans son ouvrage La Science-Fiction en France. Théorie et histoire d’une littérature, Simon Bréan doute que les textes français à dominante scientifique aient pu s’émanciper de la littérature d’aventures ou de la littérature fantastique et obtenir leur indépendance générique avant l’importation des États-Unis du terme et de la notion de science fiction. Matthieu Letourneux, concernant la littérature populaire, fait directement descendre la science-fiction du roman d’aventures. La question de...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.026
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses Universitaires de Bordeaux eBooksSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207