MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034892440 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2001914117

Identification of a chemical fingerprint linking the undeclared 2017 release of <sup>106</sup> Ru to advanced nuclear fuel reprocessing

2020· article· en· W3034892440 on OpenAlexaff
Michael W. Cooke, Adrian Botti, Dorian Zok, Georg Steinhäuser, Kurt Ungar

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
FundersVolkswagen Foundation
KeywordsSpent nuclear fuelRadiochemistryIdentification (biology)Fingerprint (computing)Waste managementNuclear reprocessingNuclear chemistryNuclear fuelChemistryBusinessEngineeringComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance In the fall of 2017, a massive, undeclared release of 106 Ru occurred that was detected across Eurasia. To conclusively address the nature of the release, we have used carefully selected and established chemical transformations to reveal a chemical fingerprint for the 106 Ru contaminant that is uniquely consistent with specific methodology employed in the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. In view of international attention and investigation to date, this chemical fingerprint is the first direct evidence to this effect. This work serves, by example, as a potentially valuable addition to the field of nuclear forensics, considering that it is the only means to extract historical information from a radiopure contaminant in the absence of stable elemental anomalies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207