MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034965161 · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30314-4

COVID-19 in patients with thoracic malignancies (TERAVOLT): first results of an international, registry-based, cohort study

2020· article· en· W3034965161 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marina Chiara Garassino, Jennifer G. Whisenant, Li‐Ching Huang, Annalisa Trama, Valter Torri, Francesco Agustoni, Javier Baena, Giuseppe Luigi Banna, Rossana Berardi, Anna Bettini, Emilio Bria, Matteo Brighenti, Jacques Cadranel, Alessandro De Toma, Claudio Chini, Alessio Cortellini, Enriqueta Felip, Giovanna Finocchiaro, Pilar Garrido, Carlo Genova, Raffaele Giusti, Vanesa Gregorc, Francesco Grossi, Federica Grosso, Salvatore Intagliata, Nicla La Verde, Stephen V. Liu, Julien Mazières, Edoardo Mercadante, Olivier Michielin, Gabriele Minuti, Denis Moro‐Sibilot, Giulia Pasello, Antonio Passaro, Vieri Scotti, Piergiorgio Solli, Elisa Maria Stroppa, Marcello Tiseo, Giuseppe Viscardi, Luca Voltolini, Yi‐Long Wu, Silvia Zai, Véra Pancaldi, Anne‐Marie C. Dingemans, Jan P. van Meerbeeck, Fabrice Barlési, Heather A. Wakelee, Solange Peters, Leora Horn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFoundation MedicineMerck Sharp and DohmeBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaGrifolsPharmaMarOtsuka PharmaceuticalEisaiInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleG1 TherapeuticsClovis OncologyLes Laboratories Pierre FabreRegeneron PharmaceuticalsTakeda Pharmaceutical CompanyAbbVieSamsungBristol-Myers SquibbEuropean Respiratory SocietyMerckSpectrum PharmaceuticalsBayerGilead SciencesCelgeneNovartisExelixisSanofiRoche ItaliaGlaxoSmithKlinePfizerIncyteStanford UniversityAmgenAstraZenecaEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsMedicineLung cancerInternal medicineCohortCancer registryPneumoniaOdds ratioPopulationCancerComorbidityStage (stratigraphy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations624
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet OncologySame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207