MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035054863 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.083504

Searching for anisotropic cosmic birefringence with polarization data from SPTpol

2020· article· en· W3035054863 on OpenAlexaff
F. Bianchini, W. L. K. Wu, P. A. R. Ade, A. J. Anderson, Jason E. Austermann, J. S. Avva, L. Balkenhol, Eric J. Baxter, James A. Beall, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, H. C. Chiang, T.-L. Chou, R. Citron, C. Corbett Moran, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. Dobbs, W. Everett, Jason Gallicchio, E. M. George, A. Gilbert, N. Gupta, N. W. Halverson, J. W. Henning, G. C. Hilton, G. P. Holder, W. L. Holzapfel, J. D. Hrubes, N. Huang, Johannes Hubmayr, K. D. Irwin, L. Knox, A. T. Lee, D. Li, A. E. Lowitz, A. Manzotti, J. J. McMahon, S. S. Meyer, M. Millea, L. Mocanu, J. Montgomery, A. Nadolski, T. Natoli, J. P. Nibarger, G. I. Noble, V. Novosad, Y. Omori, S. Padin, S. Patil, C. Pryke, C. L. Reichardt, J. E. Ruhl, B. R. Saliwanchik, K. K. Schaffer, C. Sievers, G. Simard, G. Smecher, A. A. Stark, K. T. Story, C. Tucker, K. Vanderlinde, Todd Veach, J. D. Vieira, G. Wang, N. Whitehorn, V. Yefremenko

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsThree-Speed Logic (Canada)Canadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchMcGill University
FundersAustralian Research CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilOffice of ScienceUniversity of MelbourneNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterKavli FoundationGordon and Betty Moore FoundationArgonne National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyKavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa BarbaraUniversity of ChicagoNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBirefringenceAnisotropyPolarization (electrochemistry)COSMIC cancer databasePhysicsOpticsAstronomyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors report on a search for cosmic birefringence in a region of the southern sky, with the South Pole Telescope. They reconstruct a map of cosmic polarization rotation anisotropies and measure the angular power spectrum of the map, finding it to be consistent with zero. This non detection is used to place constraints on the strength of primordial magnetic fields and of the coupling constant of the electromagnetic Chern-Simons term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207