Alternative polyadenylation is a determinant of oncogenic Ras function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Alternative polyadenylation of pre-mRNA has been recently shown to play important roles in development and cancer. Activating mutations in the Ras oncogene are common drivers of many human cancers but the mechanisms by which they cooperate with alternative polyadenylation are not known. By exploiting the genetics of C. elegans , we identified cfim-1/CFIm25 , a subunit of the alternative polyadenylation machine, as a key determinant of hyperactive Ras function. Ablation of cfim-1 increased penetrance of multivulva phenotype in let-60/Ras gain-of-function (gf) mutant through shortening of transcripts at the 3’ untranslated region, including p21 activated kinase pak-1/PAK1 and multidrug transporter mrp-5/ABCC1 . Depletion of CFIm25 in human KRAS-driven cancer cells resulted in a similar shortening of 3’ untranslated regions in the PAK1 and ABCC1 transcripts, which caused an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and increased cell migration. Exploiting the mechanisms by which alternative polyadenylation affects activated oncogene output could offer novel approaches for the treatment of Ras-driven tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".