MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035107854 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.c471

A Comparative Study of 2-Dimensional Hydraulic Modeling Software, Case Study: Sorrento Valley, San Diego, California

2020· article· en· W3035107854 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kian Bagheri, W. Requieron

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSan Diego State University
KeywordsFlood mythArchaeologyEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sorrento West business park, a business campus for biotechnology and scientific research, is a flood prone hotspot in San Diego, California. Roselle Street and Dunhill Street experience flooding multiple times a year due to overtopping of adjacent channels, including Carroll Canyon Creek, Los Peasquitos Creek and Flintkote Channel. A flood significantly affects the businesses and people of the area, trapping employees and customers inside businesses, forcing the shutdown of the Coaster service and access to the I-5 freeway, and causing hundreds of thousands of dollars in property damage. Previous one-dimensional hydraulic studies conducted on the flood capacity of these channels show that they only have capacity to contain the 5 y storm event. This study incorporates two different two-dimensional hydraulic modeling techniques to supplement previous one-dimensional hydraulic studies. These two models were prepared with the United States Army Corps of Engineers Hydrological Engineering Center's River Analysis System (USACE HEC-RAS) and PCSWMM. In addition, a sensitivity analysis of the two two-dimensional models was performed to compare the response of the models to the research assumptions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207