MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035135995 · doi:10.1002/eng2.12179

Optimized planning of repair works for pipelines in water distribution networks using genetic algorithm

2020· article· en· W3035135995 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zahra Zangenehmadar, Osama Moselhi, Sasan Golnaraghi

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersQatar National Research Fund
KeywordsTime horizonPipeline transportPipeline (software)Reliability engineeringScheduling (production processes)Total costComputer scienceWater supplyRisk analysis (engineering)Preventive maintenanceGenetic algorithmOperations researchEngineeringMathematical optimizationOperations managementBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract One of the main reasons for pipeline breakage and leakage is aging. This results in a decline in system efficiency, and associated levels of service, which in turn may endanger public health and safety. Since the most expensive and significant part of a water supply system is the distribution network, repair strategies are necessary to protect the value of the assets when a pipeline reaches the end of its useful life. Usually, repair works are taken as a reaction to the detection of a leak, pressure improvement and other factors that eventually results in an inefficient management of allocated funds. Therefore, a careful computational analysis should be performed to efficiently utilize the allocated budge. This paper presents a near‐optimized budget allocation model that is able to find the near‐optimal scheduling plan for renewal and/or replacement. The aim of this paper is to suggest a new model in order to minimize the number of breaks over a given planning horizon and the overall cost of repair of water distribution networks (WDNs), including indirect damage cost, direct damage cost, and failure repair cost while fulfilling functional requirements. The model will identify the pipe segment that needs replacement, time of replacement, and the necessary interventions that should be carried out for the network. It also identifies those pipelines that need repair. The solution is usually constrained by the yearly limited budget. The optimization procedure results in a solution alternative that decision‐makers could use for their operational requirements. The outcome of the developed model is validated based on the available leakage and breakage data from the city of Montreal database and an existing validated model. The model forecast that, in the next 20 years, 19.7% of the network will need open trench repair, 25.3% could be repaired using trenchless techniques, while 50.9% of the pipelines will remain intact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering ReportsSame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207