MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035183237 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3001426

Multi-Objective Optimization of Wavelet-Packet-Based Features in Pathological Diagnosis of Alzheimer Using Spontaneous Speech Signals

2020· article· en· W3035183237 on OpenAlexaff
Mahda Nasrolahzadeh, Javad Haddadnia, Shahryar Rahnamayan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavelet packet decompositionComputer scienceWaveletPattern recognition (psychology)Entropy (arrow of time)Feature selectionArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionNetwork packetFrequency bandWavelet transformFeature extractionBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer's disease (AD) ranks among the main types of neurodegenerative disorders. Patients suffering AD should tackle serious problems since their language skills malfunction. The impact of such disorders is reflected by reduced quality and feature variation of spontaneous speech signals in speech analysis. This paper aims at assessing the variations of some specific types of these energy- and entropy-based features within the frequency range of the speech signals. In the approach followed, the wavelet-packet coefficients are utilized to extract the energy and entropy measures at every spectral sub-band in six successive levels of decomposition. However, the decomposition process conducts a set of high-dimensional feature vectors that is a challenging task for feature selection. This study suggests the application of a Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) for enhancing a group of the sub-band indexes of a wavelet-packet for which the extracted features lead to the highest diagnosis rate of the grouping of Alzheimer's and healthy individuals. The technique proposed here showed that the best overall classification results for both optimized entropy feature vs. energy are more noticeable in discriminating patients with AD from healthy subjects. It is also confirmed the significant impact of multi-objective feature selection on performance of classification (i.e., disease diagnosis) and, its conformity to the disordered nature of the biological signals could help diagnose AD in an efficient manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207