MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3035200050 · doi:10.17269/s41997-020-00361-y

Correction to: COVID-19 and people who use drugs: a call for action

2020· erratum· en· W3035200050 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ehsan Jozaghi, Russ Maynard, Dave Hamm, Samona Marsh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Public Health · 2020
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Nurses in OncologyPHS Community Services SocietyVancouver Native Health SocietyBC Centre for Disease Control
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpellingCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Call to actionAction (physics)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)LinguisticsComputer sciencePsychologyMedicineVirologyPhilosophyBusinessInternal medicineAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.182
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.182
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0340.045
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Public Health→Same topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies→French-language works237,207→