MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035278080 · doi:10.1353/tsw.2020.0005

The Lim Transcriptions of Anna Letitia Barbauld's Letters to Lydia Rickards: A Critique

2020· article· en· W3035278080 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William McCarthy

Bibliographic record

VenueTulsa Studies in Women s Literature · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyDescendantEnlightenmentArtPower (physics)Art historyPassionLiteratureHistoryPhilosophyTheologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lim Transcriptions of Anna Letitia Barbauld's Letters to Lydia Rickards:A Critique William McCarthy (bio) Anna Letitia Barbauld, letters, transcription, archives, women's writing, women's and gender studies In 2019, Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature published transcripts by Jessica W. H. Lim of thirty-one letters written by Anna Letitia Barbauld (1743-1825) to Lydia Rickards (1784-1867).1 The letters to Lydia constitute the only surviving long series of Barbauld letters known today. Barbauld wrote them between 1798, when Lydia came from Birmingham to be her pupil, and 1815, the year when Lydia, then Mrs. William Withering, suffered an illness that caused permanent dementia. Lydia died childless. The letters Barbauld wrote to her remained in the Rickards family. In November 1891, a collateral descendant, Edith Cordelia Rickards (d. 1929), published extracts from them in Murray's Magazine; those were the texts on which I had to depend in my biography, Anna Letitia Barbauld: Voice of the Enlightenment (2008).2 In 2011, Lydia's last collateral descendant died childless in a nursing home. By sheer good luck (so the story goes), the packet of letters was rescued from what threatened to be disposal and put to auction. They were purchased by a Canadian independent scholar, Joanna Kafarowski, who, five years later, sold them to me. After transcribing and photographing the letters, in August 2016 I delivered them to the Carl H. Pforzheimer Collection of Shelley and His Circle at the New York Public Library, their current owner. The collection consists of thirty-nine holograph letters from Barbauld to Lydia; three from Barbauld to Lydia's mother; a letter by Barbauld's nephew and adopted son, Charles Rochemont Aikin, to Lydia; and several other documents.3 Five of Barbauld's letters to Lydia, dating to 1800 or soon after, offer instruction on language, Homer, and history. The letters on history were published by Lucy Aikin in a collection of Barbauld's writings for young people, A Legacy for Young Ladies (1826).4 These instructional letters, but not the social ones, will appear in an edition of Barbauld's collected works in progress from Oxford University Press. In part, no doubt, because learning to read Barbauld's hand takes practice, Lim's transcripts of the letters to Lydia are often erroneous. Collation of the thirty-one letters she transcribed with my own transcripts and, in doubtful cases, with my images of the originals has disclosed 249 errors: on eighteen occasions Lim adds a word not in the original, on thirty occasions she omits a word, and on 201 occasions she misconstrues a word. Aside from suffering from the difficulties presented by Barbauld's rapid [End Page 151] handwriting, the Lim transcripts suggest unfamiliarity with Barbauld's turns of phrase, the people she knew, and authors she read and quoted—unfamiliarity, also, with the conventions of letter-writing and letter-posting in Barbauld's day. My collations did not include matters of punctuation or paragraphing. Lim interprets Barbauld's frequent dashes in the letters as, in effect, paragraph breaks. They may sometimes be, but the effect, in Lim's transcriptions, is often to break up a topic and make a new paragraph out of what seems to have been, for Barbauld, a further thought about an ongoing subject. It would have been less intrusive to leave the dashes in place and observe only Barbauld's own explicit paragraphing. The errors in Lim's transcriptions are important to note because they affect perceptions of the letters. Most obviously, readers not previously acquainted with Barbauld's social milieu will be sent looking for names unknown to Barbauld or sometimes for real individuals who did not belong to her circle. In two transcripts, Barbauld is made to speak of men when in the originals she speaks of women: "Mrs Opie," "Mrs Beecroft," "Mrs Rickards," and "Mrs Milligan," not "Mr." any of these (pp. 168, 191). On the other hand, the poet Samuel Rogers, whom Barbauld knew, becomes "Mrs Susan Rogers" (p. 174). Barbauld's relations by marriage, the Kinders, in Lim's transcriptions are the "Flinders" on one occasion (p. 178) and the "Sheridans" on others (pp. 172...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTulsa Studies in Women s LiteratureSame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207