MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035313152 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.104432

Anomalous helimagnetic domain shrinkage due to the weakening of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in CrAs

2020· article· en· W3035313152 on OpenAlex
Bingying Pan, Haichao Xu, Yang Liu, Ronny Sutarto, Feizhou He, Yao Shen, Yiqing Hao, Jun Zhao, Leland Harriger, Donglai Feng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityFudan UniversityNational Research Council CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of SaskatchewanCanadian Light Source
KeywordsAntiferromagnetismCondensed matter physicsSpinsDomain (mathematical analysis)PhysicsThermalDomain wall (magnetism)Helix (gastropod)ShrinkageChemistryMaterials scienceMagnetic fieldQuantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CrAs is a well-known helimagnet with the double-helix structure originating from the competition between the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) and antiferromagnetic exchange interaction $J$. By resonant soft-x-ray scattering, we observe the magnetic peak (0 0 ${q}_{m}$) that emerges at the helical transition with ${T}_{S}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\approx}267.5\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$. Intriguingly, the helimagnetic domains significantly shrink on cooling below $\ensuremath{\sim}255\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$, opposite to the conventional thermal effect. The weakening of DMI on cooling is found to play a critical role here. It causes the helical wave vector to vary, ordered spins to rotate, and extra helimagnetic domain boundaries to form at local defects, thus leading to the anomalous shrinkage of helimagnetic domains. Our results indicate that the size of magnetic helical domains can be controlled by tuning DMI in certain helimagnets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it