MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035372337 · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2020.00147

SMR/Theta Neurofeedback Training Improves Cognitive Performance and EEG Activity in Elderly With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study

2020· article· en· W3035372337 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Aging Neuroscience · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurofeedbackMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMemory spanWechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleAudiologyPsychologyCognitionCognitive trainingElectroencephalographyNeuropsychologyEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceCognitive impairmentMedicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationWorking memoryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Neurofeedback (NF) training, as a method of self-regulation of brain activity, may be beneficial in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment. In this pilot study, we investigated whether a sensorimotor (SMR)/ theta NF training could improve cognitive performance and brain electrical activity in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment. Methods. Twenty elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were assigned to 20 consecutive sessions of sensorimotor (SMR)/ theta NF training, during 10 weeks, on a basis of 2 sessions each week. Neuropsychological assessments and questionnaires as well as electroencephalogram (EEG) were performed and compared between baseline (T0), after the last NF training session at 10 weeks (T1), and one-month follow-up (T2). Results. Repeated measures ANOVA reveal that from baseline to post-intervention, participants showed significant improvement in the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCa, F= 4.78; p=0.012), the delayed recall of the Rey auditory verbal learning test (RAVLT, F= 3.675; p=0.032), the Forward digit span (F= 13.82; p<0.0001), the Anxiety Goldberg Scale (F=4.54; p=0.015), the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Score –Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) (F=24.75; p<0.0001), and the Mac Nair score (F=4.47 ; p=0.016). EEG theta power (F=4.44; p= 0.016) and alpha power (F=3.84; p=0.027) during eyes-closed resting state significantly increased after the NF training, and showed sustained improvement at one-month follow-up. Conclusion. Our results suggest that NF training could be effective to reduce cognitive deficits in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment, and improve their EEG activity. If these findings are confirmed by randomized controlled studies with larger samples of patients, NF could be seen as useful non-invasive, non-pharmacological tool for preventing further decline, rehabilitation of cognitive function in elderly. Trial Registration: This pilot study was a preliminary step before the trial registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the number of NCT03526692.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it