MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035408467 · doi:10.2337/db20-278-or

278-OR: Efficacy and Safety of Anti-interleukin (IL)-21 in Combination with Liraglutide in Adults Recently Diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes

2020· article· en· W3035408467 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthias G. von Herrath, Stephen C. Bain, Bruce W. Bode, Jesper O. Clausen, Ken Coppieters, Janusz Gumprecht, Troels Krarup Hansen, Chantal Mathieu, Ofri Mosenzon, Stine Segel, George Tsoukas, Thomas R. Pieber

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiraglutideMedicinePlaceboClinical endpointType 2 diabetesGlycemicInsulinInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusMealRandomized controlled trialEndocrinologyGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To evaluate the effect of anti-IL-21 and liraglutide, alone and in combination, compared to placebo, on preservation of β-cell function after 54 weeks of treatment in adults with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Methods: This was a multicenter, double-dummy, double-blind, efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic randomized control trial (NCT02443155) in adults recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and non-fasting C-peptide peak ≥0.2 nmol/L, comprising a 54-week treatment period followed by a 26-week observation period. Primary endpoint: area under the curve (AUC)0-4h for meal-stimulated C-peptide at week 54 relative to baseline. Results: At week 54, combination treatment was associated with a significant improvement of 48% in meal-stimulated C-peptide secretion versus placebo (Table). The insulin requirement was significantly lowered by 0.13 U/kg. Trends for better glycemic control and lower risk of hypoglycemic episodes at 54 weeks compared to placebo were also observed. No safety concerns were identified. Treatment benefits were not sustained at 26 weeks after end of treatment. Conclusion: Treatment with anti-IL-21 and liraglutide for 54 weeks was safe and resulted in sustained insulin secretion and lower insulin dose. Trends for improved glucose control and fewer hypoglycemic episodes compared to placebo were observed. Disclosure M.G. von Herrath: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. S.C. Bain: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lilly Diabetes, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Napp Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca. B.W. Bode: Advisory Panel; Self; InPen, Medtronic. Consultant; Self; ADOCIA, Eli Lilly and Company, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Inc. Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Diasome Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk A/S, Provention Bio, Inc., Senseonics, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., InPen, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., MannKind Corporation, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Sanofi, Senseonics, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Glytec. J. Clausen: Other Relationship; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. K. Coppieters: Other Relationship; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. L. Gaysina: None. J. Gumprecht: Consultant; Self; Astra, Bioton, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mundipharma International, Novo Nordisk A/S, Polfa Tarchomin S.A., Sanofi, Servier. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Astra, Bioton, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mundipharma International, Novo Nordisk A/S, Polfa Tarchomin S.A., Sanofi, Servier. T.K. Hansen: None. C. Mathieu: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Intrexon, MannKind Corporation, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk Inc., Pfizer Inc., Roche Diagnostic USA, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Intrexon, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. C. Morales Portillo: Board Member; Self; Novo Nordisk, Lilly, MSD, Astra, Sanofi, Abbot. Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Pzifer, Lilly, Merck, Lexicon, FPS, Hanmi, Janssen, Boehringer, Takeda, Roche, Theracos. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Roche, Lilly, Boehringer, MSD, Ferrer, Janssen, Abbot. O. Mosenzon: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. S. Segel: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Employee; Spouse/Partner; Novo Nordisk A/S. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Stock/Shareholder; Spouse/Partner; Novo Nordisk A/S. G.M. Tsoukas: Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen, Novo Nordisk Inc. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Amgen Canada. T. Pieber: Advisory Panel; Self; ADOCIA, Arecor, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Diagnostics K.K. Funding Novo Nordisk A/S

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207