MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035445551 · doi:10.38087/2595.8801.39

A CONTRIBUIÇÃO DA BRINQUEDOTECA PARA A REALIZAÇÃO DO TRABALHO PEDAGÓGICO

2020· article· pt· W3035445551 on OpenAlexaff
Marta Schmitd O'Connell

Bibliographic record

VenueCOGNITIONIS Scientific Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pesquisa investiga a ludicidade como elemento de aprendizagem facilitador do trabalho pedagógico através da brinquedoteca. A esquisa objetiva refletir sobre a função da brinquedoteca como ferramenta lúdica e seu apoio como elemento de aprendizagem na realização do trabalho pedagógico. Foi adotada como metodologia a pesquisa bibliográfica, na qual foi realizada a leitura crítica, a edação de resumos e paráfrases das obras pertinentes ao enfrentamento do tema e à comprovação das hipóteses. Esta pesquisa onstatou que a valorização da brinquedoteca cresceu e seu papel se afirma frente aos avanços das ciências humanas e biológicas ue confirmam a importância do lúdico para o desenvolvimento, preservação e recuperação de habilidades e competências físicas, sicológicas e sociais das crianças.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.277
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCOGNITIONIS Scientific JournalSame topicEducation Pedagogy and PracticesFrench-language works237,207