MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035461667 · doi:10.3989/ic.71428

Determinación de la longitud de transferencia de alambres con distintos grados de corrosión en elementos pretensados de hormigón

2020· article· es· W3035461667 on OpenAlex
Pablo Anaya, Jesús Flores Rodríguez, Carmen Andrade, Beatriz Martín‐Pérez, Cecilio López Hombrados

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInformes de la Construcción · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En elementos pretensados de hormigón, la adherencia entre el acero y el hormigón puede verse deteriorada por diferentes motivos, siendo uno de los más recurrentes el daño inducido por procesos de corrosión. El parámetro fundamental para caracterizar las propiedades adherentes existentes entre el acero pretensado y el hormigón es la longitud de transferencia. Este artículo compara los resultados experimentales obtenidos en ensayos sobre elementos pretensados tipo viga con las predicciones arrojadas por un modelo analítico, basado en la teoría de cilindros de pared gruesa y en la fisuración cohesiva del hormigón, desarrollado para analizar los procesos de degradación de la adherencia motivados por la corrosión en alambres lisos e indentados y su influencia en el comportamiento de elementos pretensados de hormigón.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it