MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035501454 · doi:10.1177/2045894020936913

Incident pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with Bosutinib

2020· article· en· W3035501454 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePulmonary Circulation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBosutinibMedicineDasatinibPulmonary hypertensionCardiologyInternal medicineTyrosine-kinase inhibitorPulmonary toxicityMyeloid leukemiaLungImatinib

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Dasatinib is a known cause of drug-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension. There have been case reports linking Bosutinib with deterioration of pre-existing pulmonary arterial hypertension. Here, we present a case of a 37-year-old woman with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with Bosutinib who was diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Prior to Bosutinib, she had received Dasatinib without documented cardiopulmonary toxicity. Withdrawal of Bosutinib led to partial reversal of pulmonary arterial hypertension, and with the addition of pulmonary arterial hypertension-targeted treatment, there was near normalization of hemodynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it