MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035528052 · doi:10.1109/tccn.2020.2993976

IEEE TCCN Special Section Editorial: Intelligent Resource Management for 5G and Beyond

2020· article· en· W3035528052 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceSpecial sectionResource management (computing)Resource (disambiguation)Process (computing)Section (typography)CognitionData scienceTelecommunicationsComputer networkMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Learning from massive network data to produce cognitive knowledge for efficient resource management in 5G and beyond 5G (B5G) is still challenging. We are delighted to introduce the readers to this special section of the IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking (TCCN), which aims at exploring recent advances and addressing practical challenges in the intelligent resource management in 5G/B5G. We have received a total number of 30 submissions, and after a rigorous review process, 15 articles have been selected for publication, which are briefly discussed as follows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it