MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035542151 · doi:10.22331/q-2022-05-30-725

A device-independent protocol for XOR oblivious transfer

2022· article· en· W3035542151 on OpenAlexafffund
Srijita Kundu, Jamie Sikora, Ernest Y.-Z. Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueUniversity of WaterlooQuantERANational Research FoundationNational University of SingaporeEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science FoundationGovernment of CanadaMinistry of Education - SingaporeCentre for Quantum TechnologiesInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
KeywordsOblivious transferComputer scienceProtocol (science)Alice (programming language)AdversaryTask (project management)Function (biology)Alice and BobQuantumQuantum cryptographyTheoretical computer scienceCryptographyValue (mathematics)Transfer (computing)Computer securityQuantum informationPhysicsQuantum mechanicsParallel computingProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oblivious transfer is a cryptographic primitive where Alice has two bits and Bob wishes to learn some function of them. Ideally, Alice should not learn Bob's desired function choice and Bob should not learn any more than what is logically implied by the function value. While decent quantum protocols for this task are known, many become completely insecure if an adversary were to control the quantum devices used in the implementation of the protocol. In this work we give a fully device-independent quantum protocol for XOR oblivious transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuantumSame topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207