MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035582122

RIGHT ARRANGEMENTS IN THE SURROGATE MOTHER AGREEMENT (RENTAL RAHIM) TO CONTINUE

2020· article· en· W3035582122 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProsiding Simposium Nasional Magister (SINMAG) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMarriage and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRentingLegalizationNormativeState (computer science)BusinessRental housingLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The practice of full-time uterine rental applies in a number of countries, including Ukraine, Canada, Australia, and Singapore. In fact, in Russia the presence of a surrogate mother has been practiced in this country since 1995. The purpose of this study is to find out the underlying reasons for the non-legalization of uterine rental practices in Indonesia and to study the uterine rental regulations in  Russia. The research method used is a normative research method based on laws or regulations which are conceptualized as rules and norms. From the results of this study it was concluded that in Indonesia the practice of uterine rental is contrary to Indonesia's positive law, especially in Article 127 of Law Number 36 Year 2009 prohibiting the practice of uterine rental. The results of the analysis state that the practice of uterine rental in  Russia is legalized . Keywords: Illegal, Regulation, Uterus Rental

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it