MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035643055 · doi:10.33137/ijournal.v5i2.34466

Biopower, Police Accountability, and Emotional Labour in the Age of Social Media

2020· article· en· W3035643055 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michelle Phan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe iJournal Student Journal of the Faculty of Information · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutreachLaw enforcementAccountabilityBiopowerRacismCommunity policingEnforcementPublic relationsSociologySocial mediaRacial profilingCriminologyPolitical scienceLawRace (biology)Gender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technological mechanisms work in tandem with law enforcement agencies in order to surveil Black communities across North America. Body cameras and police officers use TikTok (and its predecessor Vine) under the guise of accountability and community outreach while utilizing these new technological tools as surveillance techniques. The body is utilized as a frame of analysis to understand how these tools specifically operate. Using the lenses of time, replication, surveillance, and emotional labour, this paper seeks to explore the ways Black cultural capital is exploited to perpetuate the structural violence of a law enforcement body, but also in the ways that Black communities on social media resist exploitation of their cultural capital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.028
Scholarly communication0.0120.011
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe iJournal Student Journal of the Faculty of InformationSame topicGender, Feminism, and MediaFrench-language works237,207