The 18 November 2015 Magnetopause Crossing: The GEM Dayside Kinetic Challenge Event Observed by MMS/HPCA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract At Earth's dayside magnetopause, the fundamental process known as magnetic reconnection is responsible for connecting geomagnetic field lines to interplanetary magnetic field lines and converting magnetic energy into particle energy and heat. As part of a coordinated analysis effort by the Geospace Environment Modeling (GEM) community to determine the reconnection location and other aspects of reconnection, a magnetopause crossing by the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission on 18 November 2015 was selected. The crossing occurred during stable solar wind and dominantly southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions. The MMS satellites were located close to the subsolar region and observed southward accelerated ion jets during encounters with the magnetopause boundary layers, indicating the presence of an active X‐line north of the satellites. Using proton distributions from the Hot Plasma Composition Analyzer (HPCA) instruments, the distance from the spacecraft to the reconnection site was initially determined to be between 5 to 7 R E . A slight rotation of the interplanetary magnetic field caused a change of the magnetic topology at the magnetopause. This topology change produced conditions which are known to change the location of the X‐line. After the change, the location of the component reconnection line was estimated to be less than 4 R E , but most likely was much closer to the observing satellites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".