MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3035663572 · doi:10.4095/326041

Structural controls and relative timing of gold mineralization of the banded iron formation-associated Tiriganiaq deposit, Meliadine district, Rankin Inlet greenstone belt, Nunavut

2020· report· en· W3035663572 on OpenAlexaffabout
B St. Pierre, P Mercier-Langevin, Jean-F. Blais, G Servelle, M Simard, O Côté-Mantha, Michel Malo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenstone beltMineralization (soil science)GeologyGeochemistryInletOceanographyArcheanSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Meliadine gold district is hosted within the Archean (ca. 2660 Ma) polydeformed Rankin Inlet greenstone belt, Nunavut. The district comprises numerous gold deposits and prospects that are spatially associated with the Pyke Fault and its splays. This includes the currently producing Tiriganiaq deposit, which is hosted within the turbidite-dominated structural hanging wall of the Lower Fault, a west-trending splay of the Pyke Fault. The 1150 and 1250 'lode series' within the Tiriganiaq deposit are a series of ore zones with complex geometries. Before underground development, the knowledge of gold-grade distribution in these zones was based on surface drilling results and could therefore not take into account some of the small-scale structural features that control ore grade and ore zone geometry (e.g. <25 m wavelength folding). New field relationships document the importance of horizontal to shallowly south-dipping ore-bearing extensional quartz±ankerite veins. These veins are associated with sulphide replacement zones that are preferentially developed in tightly folded banded iron formation (BIF) intervals. Folding and veining are associated with the main phase of deformation in the deposit area, which corresponds to the second phase (D2) of regional deformation. The D2 deformation at the Tiriganiaq deposit can be further subdivided into two main protracted phases: the first phase (D2A), which is associated with northeast-southwest-oriented shortening and F2A folding; and the second phase (D2B), which is associated with north-south shortening, further folding (F2B), and reverse shearing and veining (shallowly south-dipping extension veins and moderately north-dipping shear veins). The 1150 and 1250 lodes provide an excellent example of the complex geometry of the ore-bearing veins found within the shallowly west-plunging F2B folded BIF successions. These zones provide some of the highest gold grades within the Tiriganiaq deposit and thus highlight the importance of fold hinges and their effect on the generation of favourable traps (thickened BIF intervals), the development of narrow shears (along the limbs), and the development of associated extensional veins in the competent BIF layers, forming structurally and lithologically controlled high-grade zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→