MétaCan
← all works

Deep semantic segmentation of natural and medical images: a review

2020· review· en· 849 citations· W3035665735 on OpenAlex· 10.1007/s10462-020-09854-1

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread
0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

The record

Venue
PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)
Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
Polytechnique MontréalUniversité de MontréalSimon Fraser University
Funders
Keywords
Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceSegmentationImage segmentationCategorizationContext (archaeology)Task (project management)Image (mathematics)Segmentation-based object categorizationDeep learningPattern recognition (psychology)Scale-space segmentationComputer visionGeography
Has abstract in OpenAlex
no