Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au sujet du Queyras (Hautes-Alpes), la thèse d’une vallée de haute montagne fermée, sans lien véritable avec l’extérieur et rétive au progrès a été exprimée par Raoul Blanchard et reprise par des historiens des Alpes et du Queyras (Robert Burns, général Guillaume, etc.). Or, elle est démentie par des études récentes ou des faits, naguère ignorés, matériels (irrigation de 50 % des terres et « niche » de marché) ou immatériels, qui relèvent de la culture : tableaux, vitraux, statues, goût pour l’érudition, pratique du théâtre et du plain-chant, haut niveau d’instruction. Pour comprendre ce qui a donné du crédit aux thèses sur la fermeture, l’archaïsme, l’extériorité à l’histoire, il faut analyser l’épistémè de ceux qui ont formulé ces thèses, c’est-à-dire ce qu’ils ont présupposé avant toute analyse : importance accordée aux conditions (naturelles, physiques ou géographiques), positivisme, déterminisme, primauté donnée à l’agriculture sur le négoce.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".