MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035754552 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.29.1.03

<i>Tóta Tánon Ohkwá:ri</i>: A Community-Driven Production and the Renormalization of the Kanien’kéha Language

2020· article· fr· W3035754552 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marion Konwanénhon Delaronde

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSociologyEthnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À travers une description détaillée du processus complexe de production et de création de l’émission de télévision jeunesse Tóta tánon Ohkwá:ri — émission de marionnettes en langue Kanien’kéha —, la réalisatrice Marion Konwanénhon Delaronde se penche sur les nombreux impacts socioculturels positifs qui naissent de cette initiative locale : renormalisation de l’usage de la langue, revitalisation de certains récits, pratiques et épistémologies traditionnelles, réflexions collectives quant aux défis actuels que doivent relever les jeunes de la communauté de Kahnawà:ke, dialogues et rapprochements intergénérationnels, guérison de certains traumas vécus dans les pensionnats autochtones, etc. Œuvrant à partir du Centre linguistique et culturel Kanien’kehá:ka Onkwawén:na Raotitióhkwa (KORLCC), l'auteure effectue une analyse approfondie de sa relation dialogique et constructive avec ses collègues et les publics de tous âges lors de différentes étapes de la réalisation de l’émission. Elle dresse ainsi le portrait des besoins et des forces de sa communauté, tout en situant ses propres prises de conscience personnelles quant à sa relation avec sa culture et son domaine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207