MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035766450 · doi:10.1111/head.13865

Alterations in Functional Connectivity During Different Phases of the Triggered Migraine Attack

2020· article· en· W3035766450 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nazia Karsan, Pyari Bose, Owen O’Daly, Fernando Zelaya, Peter J. Goadsby

Bibliographic record

VenueHeadache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMigraineMedicinePlaceboAuraPopulationFluid-attenuated inversion recoveryAnesthesiaMigraine with auraResting state fMRIPhysical therapyMagnetic resonance imagingPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To understand the changes in functional connectivity between brain areas of potential importance in migraine during different phases of the attack. BACKGROUND: Migraine is a symptomatically heterogeneous disorder. Understanding the possible changes in brain function and, therefore, neurobiology during different phases of the migraine attack is important in developing disease biomarkers and advancing therapeutics. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-visit experimental study. METHODS: Subjects aged 18-50 years with migraine with and without aura (≤22 headache days per month) were recruited from across the UK using advertising, from both population and hospital clinic samples (n = 53). Consented subjects were randomized to a 0.5 µg/kg/min nitroglycerin infusion or to placebo over 20 minutes across different study visits, during the period February 2015-July 2017.* All subjects were exposed to a nitroglycerin infusion at least on 1 occasion at screening.** For those subjects who consented to participate in imaging visits (n = 25), structural T1, T2 and FLAIR sequences and resting state blood oxygen level dependant contrast (rsBOLD) time series, using a multiecho EPI sequence, were conducted over 30-40 minutes at baseline and rsBOLD during premonitory symptoms and migraine headache on a 3T General Electric MR750 MRI scanner. For the placebo visit, the imaging was conducted at the same times following infusion in the absence of symptoms. RESULTS: Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinates were used to characterize identified brain areas of connectivity change. Using repeated measures ANOVA models with time (visit number) and trigger substance (nitroglycerin/placebo) as factors, significant positive functional coupling was found between the thalami bilaterally and the right precuneus and cuneus regions during the nitroglycerin-triggered premonitory phase (T = 3.23, peak connectivity change at [-6, -68, 40] for left thalamus, P = 0.012 and [-4, -68, 40] for right thalamus, P = 0.019). The nitroglycerin-triggered premonitory phase was associated with a change in the direction of connectivity from positive to negative between the pons and the limbic lobe (T = 3.47, peak connectivity change at [2, 8, 50], P < 0.001). The headache phase of the nitroglycerin-triggered migraine attack was associated with ongoing negative functional coupling between the pons and the cingulate and frontal cortices, and positive functional coupling between the pons and the cerebellar tonsils and medulla (T = 3.47, peak connectivity change at [-8, -52, -58], P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the functional reorganization between subcortical and cortical brain areas in different phases of the migraine attack provides novel insights into the abnormal sensory processing and integration during migraine, as well as functional correlation with clinical symptoms displayed during each phase. [*Correction added on July 22, 2020 after first online publication: This sentence was revised from, "Consented subjects had a 0.5 μg/kg/min nitroglycerin infusion…".] [**Correction added on July 22, 2020 after first online publication: This sentence was revised from, "… at least on 1 occasion at screening."].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeadache The Journal of Head and Face PainSame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207