MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035782229 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3001770

IEEE Access Special Section Editorial: Emerging Trends, Issues, and Challanges in Energy-Efficient Cloud Computing

2020· article· en· W3035782229 on OpenAlexaff
Guangjie Han, Gangyong Jia, Jaime Lloret, Yuanguo Bi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHangzhou Dianzi University
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceEnergy consumptionEfficient energy useSpecial sectionDistributed computingMobile cloud computingCloud computing securityScheduling (production processes)Operating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud computing is one of the most successful business models for providing a simple pay-as-you-go, and therefore is gaining much popularity in the industry. Customers and enterprises can maintain or scale-up a business easily while cutting down on their budget. However, energy consumption is one of the biggest problems in current cloud computing. It is both essential and urgent for governmental and industrial institutions to address this, to achieve rapid growth. The development of energy-efficient cloud computing has to be taken into consideration, which relies on the development of several key technologies: More energy-efficient mediums can be used in cloud computing at the platform level; energy-efficient scheduling algorithms, memory systems, storage systems, resource management policies, etc., can be adopted at the hypervisor level; energy-efficient scheduling, communications, and applications can be applied at the virtual machine level; and energy-efficient mobile cloud computing will be developed, involving green networking and wireless communications, cloud-based mobile applications, and limited resources management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207