MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035833925 · doi:10.7202/1069138ar

L’économie selon Agamben

2020· article· fr· W3035833925 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alain Gignac

Bibliographic record

VenueThéologiques · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le règne et la gloire du philosophe italien Agamben (2007) mène une enquête sur la trajectoire théologico-politique du concept grec « économie », depuis Aristote et les pères de l’Église jusqu’aux théologiens médiévaux (et les philosophes modernes). Il s’agit d’une oeuvre qui transgresse les frontières disciplinaires et appelle un dialogue interdisciplinaire. Si Agamben emprunte à la théologie, comment, par effet de retour, sa philosophie politique nous permet-elle de revisiter notre théologie et nos interprétations bibliques ? Dans cette deuxième partie d’un essai en deux volets, le dispositif bipolaire de l’économie divine mis en lumière par Agamben est approfondi, comme processus par lequel l’économie (gestion de la maison divine) et le ministère (gouvernement divin du monde) deviennent mystère, pavant ainsi la route à la gestion bureaucratique et tout-économique moderne, liée à la sécularisation. Or Éphésiens 3, un texte évoqué mais non analysé par Agamben, pourrait prolonger la réflexion sur la nécessité de reconnecter action et être, car la spiritualité paulinienne opère justement cette jonction qu’Agamben appelle de tous ses voeux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThéologiquesSame topicMedical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical StudiesFrench-language works237,207