MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035860303 · doi:10.3138/ctr.183.017

The Art and Legacy of Susan Benson’s Theatre Design

2020· article· en· W3035860303 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jacqueline Taucar

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCraftVisual artsBalletScholarshipArtPerformance artCostume designCriticismTheatre studiesArt historyLiteratureDanceDrama

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article reviews Patricia Flood’s new book, Susan Benson: Art, Design and Craft on Stage. With careful attention to details and techniques, Flood explores the life, the career, and the remarkable costumes and sets designed for theatre, opera, and ballet by one of Canada’s renowned theatre designers, Susan Benson. With an artist’s eye, Flood details the significant labour of taking Benson’s design work from research to performance and, in doing so, brings attention to the crafts, skills, and techniques of theatre design that often go overlooked and under-represented in the scholarship of theatre history, theory, and criticism. With almost 200 luxurious, full-colour images of set and costume renderings, design work in construction, and production photographs, this book is an invaluable resource not only for historians and scholars of theatre design, methods, and practices but also for art lovers in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.019
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207