MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035880908 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.14024

Tyrosine-protein kinase Src regulates Kv1.5 channel activity and membrane expression through interaction with the N-terminus of the channel

2020· article· en· W3035880908 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Taylore Dodd, Tingzhong Wang, Shetuan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcCell biologySH3 domainPotassium channelTyrosine kinaseChemistryPhosphorylationBiologySignal transductionBiophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kv1.5 is a voltage-gated potassium channel that generates the ultra-rapid delayed rectifier potassium current (IKur) important in the repolarization of the atrial action potential. Malfunction of the Kv1.5 channel often results in atrial fibrillation (AFib). A reduction in Kv1.5 current (IKv1.5) occurs upon activation of the endogenous tyrosine-protein kinase Src. The Src SH3 domain binds to proline-rich motifs located within the N-terminus of Kv1.5. Disruption of these binding motifs has been involved in the development of familial AFib. The mechanism underlying the reduction of IKv1.5 upon Src activation has not yet been established and the relationship between Kv1.5 and Src is poorly understood. Therefore, the present study aims to further elucidate the mechanism behind IKv1.5 reduction. The hypothesis that Src regulates Kv1.5 activity by altering the density of mature membrane-localized channels was tested using whole-cell voltage clamp and Western blot analysis. We demonstrate that Src tonically inhibits Kv1.5 activity and decreases the density of mature membrane-localized channels. Kv1.5 channels possessing mutations within the Src binding motifs were also investigated and it was determined that each binding motif contributes to the Kv1.5-Src relationship, however, the binding of Src to an individual motif is sufficiently effective. Our findings indicate that Src regulates Kv1.5 through an interaction with the N-terminal binding motifs and suggests that the inhibition of forward trafficking may be involved in the underlying mechanism. (Supported by the Heart and Stroke foundation of Canada and The Canadian Institutes of Health Research).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207