Probabilistic Sequential Multi-Objective Optimization of Convolutional Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the advent of deeper, larger and more complex convolutional neural networks (CNN), manual design has become a daunting task, especially when hardware performance must be optimized. Sequential model-based optimization (SMBO) is an efficient method for hyperparameter optimization on highly parameterized machine learning (ML) algorithms, able to find good configurations with a limited number of evaluations by predicting the performance of candidates before evaluation. A case study on MNIST shows that SMBO regression model prediction error significantly impedes search performance in multi-objective optimization. To address this issue, we propose probabilistic SMBO, which selects candidates based on probabilistic estimation of their Pareto efficiency. With a formulation that incorporates error in accuracy prediction and uncertainty in latency measurement, probabilistic Pareto efficiency quantifies a candidate's quality in two ways: its likelihood of being Pareto optimal, and the expected number of current Pareto optimal solutions that it will dominate. We evaluate our proposed method on four image classification problems. Compared to a deterministic approach, probabilistic SMBO consistently generates Pareto optimal solutions that perform better, and that are competitive with state-of-the-art efficient CNN models, offering tremendous speedup in inference latency while maintaining comparable accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".