MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Orthopaedic Management of Human Disorganization Syndrome

2020· article· en· W3035897960 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Smit, Judy So, Emily K. Schaeffer, Linlea Armstrong, Kishore Mulpuri

Bibliographic record

VenueJAAOS Global Research and Reviews · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBicepsMedicineAnatomySoft tissueTendonContractureSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human disorganization syndrome (HDS) is an extremely rare congenital syndrome characterized by a seemingly random distribution of multiple developmental anomalies involving all three germinal layers. Case Report: We report a rare case of a female child whose congenital anomalies are consistent with HDS. The orthopaedic features of this patient include a popliteus pterygium with an associated flexion contracture secondary to an elongated biceps femoris tendon that attached to the gastrocnemius-soleus muscle complex, two finger-like appendages, a tethered cord, a lipomeningomyelocele at the level of L5, and a leglength discrepancy. The patient was treated with a splinting program, release of the biceps femoris tendon at its erroneous insertion from the gastrocs-soleus, and surgical excision of the finger-like appendages. She underwent three subsequent soft-tissue releases to address recurrence of the knee flexion contracture and an anteromedial and lateral distal femoral eight plate procedure for guided growth and slow correction of the remaining flexion deformity. Conclusion: The treatment of HDS can be quite complex and can present with a variety of anomalies with distinctive orthopaedic features correctable with surgical management, including soft-tissue releases, excision of appendages, and growth modulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAAOS Global Research and ReviewsSame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207