MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035924319 · doi:10.1017/ice.2020.264

<i>Clostridioides difficile</i> toxin testing and positivity in Manitoba, Canada

2020· article· en· W3035924319 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christiaan H. Righolt, Geng Zhang, Gregory Hammond, Philippe Lagacé‐Wiens, Salaheddin M. Mahmud

Bibliographic record

VenueInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClostridioidesMedicineConfidence intervalContext (archaeology)Incidence (geometry)Clostridium difficile toxin AInternal medicineToxinEmergency medicineClostridium difficileGeographyMicrobiologyBiologyAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We assessed Clostridioides difficile toxin testing and positivity for all patients in Manitoba hospitals during June 2016-November 2018. The testing rate was 30 per 10,000 patient bed days (95% confidence interval [CI], 30-31) and the incidence rate was 3.5 per 10,000 patient bed days (95% CI, 3.3-3.7). The context of testing is essential to the interpretation of data among jurisdictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfection Control and Hospital EpidemiologySame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207