Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si on reconnaît mieux aujourd’hui l’indéniable contribution d’Arthur Buies à la littérature québécoise, jusqu’à le considérer comme « le meilleur écrivain du xixe siècle », il n’en a pas toujours été ainsi, son oeuvre ayant suscité toutes sortes de réactions négatives jusque dans les années soixante. Dissimulée derrière le personnage de l’anticlérical et du pamphlétaire, s’y révèle — en particulier dams les Lettres sur le Canada et La Lanterne — une pensée sur la nature et la condition humaines qui mérite d’être étudiée précisément dans l’angle qui a fait de Buies un maudit. En travaillant sans relâche à circonscrire un certain symptôme collectif, Buies engage le lecteur à reconnaître les effets d’un « mal » qui déborde le cadre de son époque et, comme le font d’autres écrivains et penseurs avec lesquels il dialogue, à considérer la littérature comme le lieu de la transmission d’un savoir à la fois dérangeant et essentiel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.194 | 0.065 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".