MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035945891 · doi:10.4000/pratiques.7306

Perdre ses lettres en république décadente : d’une poétique de l’internat dans Le Rivage des Syrtes de Julien Gracq

2019· article· fr· W3035945891 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePratiques · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, je me propose d’étudier une articulation singulière se jouant au sein de l’écriture du déclin dans Le Rivage des Syrtes de Julien Gracq (1989c [1951]) : la dialectique entre littératie et oralité. Si la maîtrise de l’écriture et de la lecture est associée au pouvoir dans le roman, et qu’à l’inverse, l’oralité semble vouée à l’impossibilité d’une véritable institutionnalisation, le récit nous fait la démonstration ambivalente d’une certaine conquête de la littératie par les « bruits » et la rumeur ambiante – par ce qui, finalement, n’est jamais posé sur le papier. Utilisant des outils de l’ethnocritique, j’analyse la manière dont l’opposition entre littératie et oralité se résout chez J. Gracq par un étonnant paradoxe : mettre en récit la dégénérescence de la littératie, c’est encore utiliser l’acte dont le mouvement du texte propose l’abolition – l’écriture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it