MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035991642 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.14036

Marfan Syndrome: Using genetic maps to lead the way to new diagnostics and treatments

2020· article· en· W3035991642 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ines Nannsen

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarfan syndromeConnective tissueDiseasePenetranceScoliosisMutationGeneticsBiologyFibrillinBioinformaticsExtracellular matrixPathologyMedicineGenePhenotypeInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marfan Syndrome is a heritable disorder of connective tissue caused by a mutated extracellular matrix glycoprotein protein, affecting 1 in 5,000 people worldwide. This protein is responsible for support and elasticity meaning that people affected by this disorder manifest with weakened tendons, ligaments and other connective tissues. Patients exhibit a wide variety of symptoms including, scoliosis, abnormally slender digits, vision problems and enlarged blood vessels. Marfan’s follows an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance and has a penetrance of 100%, meaning that anyone inheriting the gene will be affected by the disease. This study focuses on the developments in the field of DNA mapping and how these advancements have improved the diagnostic tools and treatments for this disease. After exploring the methodology of DNA mapping, the LOD scores for Marfan Syndrome are discussed and compared in order to conclude which chromosome carried the mutation; it was found that chromosome 15 carries. Additionally, the results compare and contrast different genetic markers and identifies a link between markers D15529 and D15545. Although this technology is fairly recent and has thus not been studied as extensively as traditional methods, the information gathered in this research illustrates the methodology of DNA mapping and how; by understanding the gene expression and mutation at a biochemical level, diagnostics and treatments for patients can be tailored specifically to the disease and not just management of the symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207