MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3036006926 · doi:10.1101/2020.06.22.165613

Age-dependent glycomic response to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus and its association with disease severity

2020· preprint· en· W3036006926 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shuhui Chen, Brian Kasper, Bin Zhang, Lauren Lashua, Ted M. Ross, Elodie Ghedin, Lara K. Mahal

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institutes of HealthCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaUniversity of Georgia
KeywordsVirusDiseasePandemicImmunosenescenceImmunologyPathogenesisInfluenza A virusBiologyMicroarray analysis techniquesVirologyMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Internal medicineGeneInfectious disease (medical specialty)Immune systemGeneticsGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Influenza A viruses cause a spectrum of responses, from mild cold-like symptoms to severe respiratory illness and death. Viral strains and intrinsic host factors, such as age, can influence the severity of the disease. Glycosylation plays a critical role in influenza pathogenesis, however the molecular drivers of influenza outcomes remain unknown. In this work, we characterized the glycomic response to the H1N1 2009 pandemic influenza A virus in age-dependent severity. Using a ferret model and a lectin microarray technology we have developed, we compared responses in newly weaned and aged animals, a model for young children and the elderly, respectively. Glycomic analysis revealed changes in glycosylation over the course of the infection, that were associated with severity in an age-dependent manner. These responses may help explain the differential susceptibility to influenza A virus infection of young children and the elderly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicInfluenza Virus Research Studies→French-language works237,207→