Dual‐polarised wideband tightly coupled dipole array for airborne applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An ultra‐wideband (UWB) array is presented for UHF‐S band (0.19–2.3 GHz) communications with an emphasis on dual‐linear polarisation and wide‐angle scanning. The array achieves 12:1 impedance bandwidth for a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) <3 at broadside with low‐angle scanning off broadside to 0°, 45°, 60° in the E ‐plane (VSWR < 3, 4, 3.1) and 0°, 45°, 60° (VSWR < 3, 3.8, 5.5) in the H ‐plane. A 7 × 11 prototype was fabricated and tested for verification. In addition, finite effects with respect to mounting UWB arrays in airborne platforms are discussed. Specifically, the effect of radomes, perfect electric conductor shielding walls and resistive walls on the gain of the designed tightly coupled dipole antenna was studied, showing that losses can approach 2 dB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".