MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036041420 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2019.0052

The Empire of the Tea Table

2019· article· en· W3036041420 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Judith Fisher

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpireTable (database)MirroringAdventureLiteratureArtHistoryArt historySociologyAncient historyCommunicationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Empire of the Tea Table Judith Fisher (bio) In the famous “proviso scene” in Congreve’s The Way of the World (1700), Millamant demands “to be sole empress of my tea-table” (380). Millamant’s tea table did become an empire: by 1871, the United Kingdom was consuming 171 million pounds of tea yearly (Cassell’s 1138). It is little wonder then that tea drinking is ubiquitous in Victorian fiction, which features scenes that include the Dickensian fireside, the country meat tea, the middle-class kettledrum, and the aristocratic five o’clock tea, the last of these purportedly invented by the Duchess of Bedford in the 1840s (Bramah 133). Mirroring the omnipresence of tea in everyday life, fictional tea scenes authenticated characters for readers, placing characters in specific social classes and geographical milieus. As Julie Fromer succinctly puts it, “Nineteenth-century representations of tea highlight the role of the tea table in forging a unified English national identity out of disparate social groups, economic classes, and genders separated by ideologically distinct spheres of daily life” (11). The intimate tea table, whether by the fire or not, creates affective connections [End Page 208] through the inclusive conversation and the acts of pouring out and handing around tea. As a space where intimacy can be performed for the reader without seeming theatrical, it is, perhaps, an essential enabler of domestic fiction. William Makepeace Thackeray’s illustration of “Laura’s fireside” in The Adventures of Philip (1862) presents the quintessential positive image. Pen is the protective, productive man (he has provided the means to acquire the tea), who, once he has been served, watches over Laura enclosing her children in her domestic temple (fig. 1). Importantly, no servants are present, implying, as readers would know, that Laura made and served the tea herself. Click for larger view View full resolution Fig. 1. “Laura’s Fireside,” from William Makepeace Thackeray, The Adventures of Philip. Author’s collection. Tea scenes told readers where in the social world they were. Two practices in particular distinguished the class status of tea drinkers: the presentation and the food. The “elite” classes (or those with pretensions) displayed elaborate equipage and ritual combined with very little food—or at least very little emphasis on food; the “lower” classes, in contrast, had simple manners (but still a degree of ritual) and a plenteous table. Such recognizable class distinctions allowed authors to use tea to establish class status and [End Page 209] pretensions. For instance, an 1887 short story in Every Week, “A Five O’Clock Tea,” depicts the upwardly mobile pretensions of Sarah Hopkins, a farmer’s daughter who, much like Rosamund Vincy, has been sent to school and has come back with her head full of “genteel” notions. When we first meet Sarah, she is playing her piano while her mother, guilty of the same verbal sole-cisms as Mrs. Vincy, pounds away on her sewing machine. Sarah introduces her mother to the idea of tea at five that is not a “supper”: “And, ma, I mean one of these new kind of teas, where you don’t get supper at all, but have a cup of tea and bread and butter, or biscuits, or sandwiches. Just one plate of something, and have the maid bring it into the drawing-room, and I’ll pass it round the room; and the green china tea-set is just the thing, and we can talk and have splendid fun. It’s the latest style” (94). Of course, the neighbours who receive the daintily written cards do not understand the new style and show up expecting a country meat tea, which Mrs. Hopkins miraculously produces. While refined tea-drinking emphasizes performance and delicate and expensive equipage, often authors disguise the fact that the brewing, pouring, and handing around of tea are learned practices. Elizabeth Gaskell, for example, in North and South (1855), mystifies the required skills and thus naturalizes the ladylike femininity of Margaret Hale, who daintily pours tea for Mr. Thornton. Similarly, Thackeray, in The Adventures of Philip, presents Laura Pendennis as a natural lady, exemplified by her graceful tea-making. Margaret Oliphant makes the class contrast between “appetite” and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian reviewSame topicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207