MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036042897 · doi:10.4324/9780429031366-4

Canada’s Feminist International Assistance Policy

2020· book-chapter· en· W3036042897 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFraming (construction)RhetoricPolitical scienceRhetorical questionNarrativePublic policyGender studiesContradictionFeminismHuman rightsSociologyPublic administrationLawEpistemologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among the most significant and prominent commitments introduced under the Liberal government, however, is the Feminist International Assistance Policy – a policy document that elevates Prime Minister Trudeau’s personal narrative and values to the level of a bold national policy vision for improved international assistance. The specific rhetorical commitments to gender equality are a particularly prominent element in the framing of Canadian international values and virtue. An overarching feminist international policy also requires thoughtful consideration of all aspects of international policy, and needs to be comprehensive and coherent to avoid the hypocritical tensions that arise from a rhetoric of feminist values combined with anti-feminist practices in other policy domains. A prominent example is the often-referenced contradiction between Canada’s public stance on human rights and gender equality in Saudi Arabia and its ongoing arms sales to Saudi Arabia, used for what can only be understood as anti-feminist ends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207