Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le progrès technique transforme l’espace et les relations humaines. La physique moderne et la psychanalyse ont souligné les fondements relationnels des espaces dans lesquels nous vivons. Si notre expérience sensible de tous les jours nous place devant un double espace, celui du dedans et celui du dehors, l’articulation entre ces deux espaces a acquis une nouvelle dimension avec les travaux de Winnicott et de Green. À la lumière de l’analyse de Théo, pour qui le cadre analytique apparaissait comme une caverne dangereuse, et de celle du mythe de Persée face à la Méduse, tel que lu par Pasche, l’importance d’un bouclier personnel est discutée. Dans le passage d’un rapport tri-dimensionnel à un rapport bi-dimensionnel, la médiation qu’offre la technologie numérique est ainsi comparée à un bouclier de Persée d’un autre ordre. Son impact est questionné à l’aune de situations cliniques avec les adolescents et de la recherche portant sur le développement des enfants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".