The structural development of soil microbial communities in reclaimed sites of a metal mine : implications to the restoration of anthropogenic disturbances
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anthropogenic activities affect the structure of terrestrial systems, leading to diminished ecosystem functions. With the cumulative area of disturbance caused by mining in British Columbia approximating 45,412 ha, it is necessary to ensure that reclamation projects are directed by ecologically relevant objectives. In this study, phospholipid fatty acid analysis was used to compare the biomass of soil microbial communities in undisturbed reference and reclaimed sites. Similar to the development of microbial communities following natural disturbance events, microbial biomass within reclaimed sites increased through time, but was significantly lower than undisturbed forests until 30 to 45 years post reclamation. Canonical correspondence analysis identified that the differences in microbial community biomass was affected by changes in soil pH and copper. Due to the long-term requirements for soil development, the assessment of reclamation projects should exceed at least 30 years post completion to properly evaluate the recovery of soil ecosystem composition and function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it